COMPARISON

Pilot vs Burkland Associates: Which delivers more value?

Choosing the right strategic financial and operations provider is crucial if you plan to grow. Pilot and Burkland’s offerings might appear similar. But only Pilot uses automation to eliminate work, gives you real-time dashboards, and has CFO advisors who move as fast as you do.

I am good at financial modeling. But Danielle at Pilot is a certified ninja.
— Leo Patching
CEO and Co-Founder, Kompliant
Watch Leo's story

See the differences

Pilot is a well-rounded partner that does it all and moves fast

Pilot offers one integrated offering where you get a trusted CFO advisor and top-tier tech. Instead of splitting your services across a traditional accounting firm, a software, and contractors, Pilot does it all—and does it well. We’ve helped startups raise $9 billion to date and impress investors.

Investor-ready financials

Pilot’s strategic CFO advisors come from VC and private equity. They can help you fundraise, craft your story, build decks, and model your business.

Audit-ready books

We keep your books unimpeachably accurate with AI-powered income and expense recognition plus an expert human bookkeeper. That human element is a vital time-saver.

Instant financial insights

With Pilot, you get live dashboards showing your cash position, profit and loss, and vendors by spend. Because the books are human-certified, they’re correct.

Complete operations

Pilot’s outsourced operations team can help you incorporate, manage banking, set up software, create new workflows, and free you to focus on growth.

Pilot is great for ...

To unite your finances, not split them across vendors.

A strategic finance partner skilled in fundraising

A partner with a tech platform built for scale.

Expert advisors to reassure your investors.

Burkland Associates is excellent at strategy and light on operations

Burkland Associates and Pilot sometimes partner on projects, where the firm’s two decades of experience help them work with big VC firms. But there are tradeoffs. Burkland charges hourly, always writes a custom scope, moves slowly, and tends to outsource the bookkeeping work. If they are your primary strategic finance partner, you are creating silos in your data.

Strong strategic finance

Burkland is well-respected in the industry and has a great track record. They have also been around since before Facebook or iPhones, and you pay for that brand.

Not a complete finance partner

Burkland doesn’t specialize in bookkeeping or operations the way Pilot does. Many customers opt to find their own bookkeeper and operations help.

May not scale with you

As a traditional accounting firm, Burkland Associates can’t grow faster than it can hire. Some founders say they ran into trouble during rapid expansions.

Burkland Associates is a fit if …

You have a truly unique finance challenge.

You can afford to move at a “wood-paneled office” pace.

You handle all your bookkeeping and operations in-house.

CUSTOMER STORY

Founders say Pilot’s speed gives them an edge

When Leo’s investor recommended he hire a fractional CFO, he balked. Leo comes from finance. He knew modeling. But he was so impressed with his Pilot CFO’s modeling, he realized he could let it go and finally focus on growth. "One of the biggest benefits of working with Pilot early is they have a view across hundreds of startups and can say, ‘You’re on track,’ which was very helpful validation,” he says.

I don’t think anyone who has been involved in Kompliant would have any issue with the finances whatsoever, and that’s remarkable. Not many startups can say that.
Leo Patching
CEO and Co-Founder, Kompliant

Founders like that Pilot unites their finances

Pilot gives me confidence in our numbers. In a fast-moving startup, there’s no room for guesswork

Move at startup speeds

Pilot’s CFOs are former VC and private equity people who’ve built companies and know the deadlines you’re under.

I consider Pilot a signal of maturity to our investors.

Audit-read books and decks

With Pilot, you get a whole team of experts so whatever arises with payroll, invoices, payments, fundraising, or company strategy, we can help.

I don’t think anyone would have any issue with our finances whatsoever, and that’s remarkable.

Integrated bookkeeping means more insight

With Pilot, you get a dedicated team doing your books and models, and that combination produces better insights.

I trust the data. Pilot knows what I need. I don't have to check it line by line. It's pretty unbelievable.
Joe Randesi
Co-Founder & CEO, Element5
SEE THE DIFFERENCES

Founders say for the same cost, they get more with Pilot

Founded
2017
2004
Focus
Strategic finance, bookkeeping, and operations for growing businesses
Top-tier strategic finance, some bookkeeping and operations (may outsource)
Pricing
Tiered subscription plus add-on offerings like R&D tax credits
Retainers, hourly billing, custom scopes
Point of Contact
Account manager, CFO, bookkeeper and controller
Account manager and CFO
Software platform
✅ Yes: live insights into cash flow, expenses, vendors, cloud spend, and more
🚫 No, services only. You’ll need your own accounting software
Automated bookkeeping
✅ Yes, but always human-reviewed for accuracy
🚫 Bookkeeping by hand, in-house staff or contractors
Fundraising & 
VC-Ready Financials
✅ Investor-grade reporting, 
due diligence support
✅ Investor-grade reporting, 
due diligence support
Industry-Specific Expertise
✅ SaaS, eCommerce, AI, healthtech, and more
🚫 Focus on venture-funded software companies

Pilot vs Burkland Associates — FAQ

What is the main difference between Pilot and Burkland Associates?
Pilot provides an integrated, tech-enabled finance stack, including bookkeeping, CFO strategy, dashboards, and operations, designed to move at startup speed. Burkland offers respected strategic finance support, but relies on slower traditional workflows and often outsources bookkeeping.
Which provider delivers more value for growing startups?
Pilot. You get investor-ready financials, real-time dashboards, a dedicated CFO advisor, full operations support, and automation that reduces manual work. Burkland brings strong strategy but lacks the unified platform and operational depth that scaling companies need.
Is Pilot or Burkland better for companies that need bookkeeping and financial operations?
Pilot. Pilot offers complete bookkeeping, automation, real-time dashboards, tax support, and operations services. Burkland focuses on strategy, and many companies must hire separate vendors for bookkeeping and operational tasks.
Which provider is faster or more “startup-friendly”?
Pilot. Pilot’s automation and modern platform help you work quickly, get instant visibility into financials, and make decisions faster. Burkland uses a traditional firm model with slower onboarding, custom scopes, and hourly billing.
Does Burkland offer bookkeeping in-house?
Not primarily. Burkland is a strategic finance firm first and often outsources bookkeeping. Pilot performs all bookkeeping internally with AI-powered automation plus expert human review.
Which provider offers better CFO-level insights?
Both offer strategic finance expertise, but Pilot pairs CFO support with detailed dashboards, integrated bookkeeping, and fundraising-ready reporting. Burkland’s CFOs are strong, but without integrated bookkeeping, insights may be siloed.
Who is better for fundraising support and investor-ready financials?
Pilot. The company has helped startups raise over $9 billion with models, deck building, fundraising prep, and due-diligence support. Burkland also supports fundraising, but without Pilot’s automation and unified stack, the process may require more manual coordination.
Which platform has better technology?
Pilot. It includes a proprietary financial platform with real-time dashboards for cash, expenses, vendors, and cloud spend. Burkland does not offer software; clients must manage their own accounting tools.
Does Pilot or Burkland scale better with a fast-growing company?
Pilot. Its scalable platform, expert CFO team, and integrated operations support growing companies without service slowdowns. Burkland is a traditional firm that scales only as fast as it can hire, and some founders report bottlenecks during rapid growth.
How do their pricing models compare?
Pilot uses a transparent tiered subscription with add-ons such as R&D tax credits. Burkland uses hourly billing, custom scopes, and retainers—making costs harder to predict at scale.
Which provider gives better visibility into financials?
Pilot. Clients receive real-time dashboards backed by accurate, human-certified books. Burkland does not provide software, which means you must reconcile financial visibility across multiple systems and vendors.
Who should choose Burkland Associates?
Companies with highly unique or niche strategic finance problems, founders who prefer a traditional firm experience, and teams that manage bookkeeping and operations internally may be a good fit.
Who should choose Pilot?
Founders who want a single partner for bookkeeping, dashboards, CFO strategy, tax help, operations, and fundraising support—all delivered quickly and backed by automation—will get significantly more value from Pilot.
Which option saves founders more time?
Pilot. Because it unifies bookkeeping, financial strategy, tax, and operations, founders spend less time coordinating vendors or double-checking data. Burkland is strong strategically, but requires additional vendors and more manual oversight.
BOOK TIME TO TALK

Book a call with Pilot.
See why it’s the solution for serious founders